North Carolina RADAR State Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the North Carolina RADAR State Exam with essential insights and practice questions to boost your confidence. This comprehensive resource will guide you through the exam requirements, helping you maximize your chances of success.

Practice this question and more.

What was the main outcome of the Brazier v. City of Philadelphia case?

Conviction was overturned due to lack of evidence
Affirmed a conviction for speeding over 7 mph
Set a new precedent for speed limits
Declared the city's ordinance unconstitutional

The correct answer is: Affirmed a conviction for speeding over 7 mph

The main outcome of the Brazier v. City of Philadelphia case is that it affirmed a conviction for speeding over 7 mph. This case is significant because it reinforced the enforcement of speed limits and established a legal precedent regarding the admissibility of radar evidence in speeding cases. The court determined that the evidence presented, which indicated that the defendant was exceeding the speed limit, was sufficient to uphold the conviction. This outcome emphasizes the judicial system's support for maintaining road safety through strict adherence to speed regulations. Additionally, the case illustrated how speed limits are legally enforceable and that individuals can be held accountable when they exceed these limits, thereby promoting public safety and compliance with traffic laws.