North Carolina RADAR State Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the North Carolina RADAR State Exam with essential insights and practice questions to boost your confidence. This comprehensive resource will guide you through the exam requirements, helping you maximize your chances of success.

Practice this question and more.

What constitutes reasonable opinion regarding vehicle speed according to U.S. v. Mudbi?

Opinion of a single officer
Two independent officers' opinions
Opinion based on vehicle type
Uncorroborated opinion by any observer

The correct answer is: Two independent officers' opinions

The established case of U.S. v. Mudbi indicates that the opinion regarding vehicle speed must be supported by reliable evidence, typically obtained from multiple credible sources. In this context, the opinion of two independent officers is deemed reasonable because it provides a greater level of reliability compared to a single officer's observation. The corroboration from two officers helps ensure that the assessment of speed is not based solely on subjective judgment but rather on a more objective evaluation, mitigating the risk of personal bias or errors that may arise from a single observer's assessment. The option involving a single officer might lack sufficient evidential support, while opinions based solely on vehicle type do not account for other critical factors influencing speed. An uncorroborated opinion by any observer would also not meet the standard of reasonable opinion in this context, as it lacks the validation needed to determine speed accurately. Thus, the requirement for corroboration by two independent officers strengthens the credibility of the speed assessment made in such legal contexts.