North Carolina RADAR State Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 400

What was the main outcome of the Brazier v. City of Philadelphia case?

Conviction was overturned due to lack of evidence

Affirmed a conviction for speeding over 7 mph

The main outcome of the Brazier v. City of Philadelphia case is that it affirmed a conviction for speeding over 7 mph. This case is significant because it reinforced the enforcement of speed limits and established a legal precedent regarding the admissibility of radar evidence in speeding cases. The court determined that the evidence presented, which indicated that the defendant was exceeding the speed limit, was sufficient to uphold the conviction.

This outcome emphasizes the judicial system's support for maintaining road safety through strict adherence to speed regulations. Additionally, the case illustrated how speed limits are legally enforceable and that individuals can be held accountable when they exceed these limits, thereby promoting public safety and compliance with traffic laws.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Set a new precedent for speed limits

Declared the city's ordinance unconstitutional

Next Question

Report this question

Download North Carolina RADAR State Practice Exam PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy